Difference between revisions of "Testing"
From Tootsville Wiki-Wiki
BRFennPocock (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== What Needs Testing == Check Builder:Status first You can validate anything on that checklist again Check also Core:News or Builder:News for things that are n...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 12:33, 22 July 2016
What Needs Testing
Check Builder:Status first
You can validate anything on that checklist again
Check also Core:News or Builder:News for things that are new and may need testing
Reporting success
If a service is marked “GO” and it's working, that's great. No action needed.
If a service is marked “GO” and it fails — report it (below)!
If a service is marked “NO GO” and it fails, that's expected, sadly. No action needed.
If a service is marked “NO GO” and it's working,
- Send a quick WALLOPS that it's back — like #(wallops "The gossipnet netsplit is cured")
- Edit the status page and change “''NO GO''” to “GO”
- If there's a BUG link, remove it.
- In the Summary: box under your edit, put something about how you verified that it was working
The Summary will show up on the History of the page, so we can figure out what's happening.
Reporting Failures
If something that was GO turns to a NO GO:
- Send a WALLOPS to see if anyone expected it to be acting differently.
- Sometimes we Builders are lame and can fix a simple mistake really fast without doing much else.
- If there isn't an immediate reply, Edit the status page
- Turn GO into ''NO GO'' ~~~~ which will “sign” it with your name
- If you have more information, write a BUG link with your handle and the date and time instead: eg, ''NO GO'' [[BUG catvlle 20160722 3pm]] or something.
- Save the page; the BUG link will be red; click it, and then click the bold red text again to create the page.
- Describe what you did to recreate the bug
- It can help to issue #(debug-info) and cut-and-paste the whole block onto the wiki page.